<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Local Search Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.localsearchsource.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com</link>
	<description>Local Internet Marketing Tips and Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Your Website Doing It&#8217;s &#8220;Job&#8221;? by Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2012/01/23/is-your-website-doing-its-job/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localsearchsource.com/?p=1644#comment-975</guid>
		<description>I like the blog and the helpful info Rich. I posted recently something similar on my Blog about converting website traffic. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the blog and the helpful info Rich. I posted recently something similar on my Blog about converting website traffic. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Your Website Doing It&#8217;s &#8220;Job&#8221;? by English Grammar Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2012/01/23/is-your-website-doing-its-job/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>English Grammar Bank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localsearchsource.com/?p=1644#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information – I was wondering more about the details… numbers, Taking into account the number of pages that my website has and the time that it has been up…. Is the site where it is supposed to be as far as ranking? will it take time? more pages to get higher ranking? (of course besides more effort)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information – I was wondering more about the details… numbers, Taking into account the number of pages that my website has and the time that it has been up…. Is the site where it is supposed to be as far as ranking? will it take time? more pages to get higher ranking? (of course besides more effort)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Updates: how they effect local search&#8230; by Nyagoslav</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2011/11/28/google-updates-how-they-effect-local-search/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyagoslav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 15:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localsearchsource.com/?p=1591#comment-576</guid>
		<description>A good summary, Rich.

I believe what Google is doing is very anti-competitive and I am not sure how it is possible they got away with it at the antitrust hearing in September.

However, I do not agree that much with one thing in the article. It is not a battle of big/small among the IYPs, rather than a battle of good content vs. bad content. Most of the directories whose rankings/visitors rose have great, top quality content (think Zagat) and, yes, generally the smaller-size directories have either no or very small amount of useful, unique content.

Whatever anyone says, content is still the king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good summary, Rich.</p>
<p>I believe what Google is doing is very anti-competitive and I am not sure how it is possible they got away with it at the antitrust hearing in September.</p>
<p>However, I do not agree that much with one thing in the article. It is not a battle of big/small among the IYPs, rather than a battle of good content vs. bad content. Most of the directories whose rankings/visitors rose have great, top quality content (think Zagat) and, yes, generally the smaller-size directories have either no or very small amount of useful, unique content.</p>
<p>Whatever anyone says, content is still the king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Local Online Success: &#8220;it&#8217;s a journey, not a destination&#8221;. by Tom Peditto</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2011/09/05/local-online-success-its-a-journey-not-a-destination/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Peditto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localsearchsource.com/?p=1481#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a concise overview of local search, useful for those with experience and others who have an understandable curiosity about the topic.  Local companies that have invested in this area, will surely see a nice ROI, if using industry accepted methods and practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a concise overview of local search, useful for those with experience and others who have an understandable curiosity about the topic.  Local companies that have invested in this area, will surely see a nice ROI, if using industry accepted methods and practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paid &amp; Organic Search: Why The Marriage Of Both Is Important by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2011/08/15/paid-organic-search-why-the-marriage-of-both-is-important/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localsearchsource.com/?p=1502#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Really interesting stuff. It seems only reasonable that more real estate will lead to a higher conversion rate. 

But should the AdWords account include both brand keywords and non-brand keywords? From the sound of it, I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting stuff. It seems only reasonable that more real estate will lead to a higher conversion rate. </p>
<p>But should the AdWords account include both brand keywords and non-brand keywords? From the sound of it, I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google+: no local-search benefits&#8230;yet by Google Plus Update for business owners - &#124; Local Search Source</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2011/07/10/google-no-local-search-benefits-yet/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Plus Update for business owners - &#124; Local Search Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 14:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localsearchsource.com/?p=1412#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] Here are some updates re. my earlier post: Google Plus &amp; the local search benefits&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here are some updates re. my earlier post: Google Plus &amp; the local search benefits&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caution! Unrealistic Internet marketing claims coming your way! by Kathy Long</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2011/06/17/caution-unrealistic-internet-marketing-claims-coming-your-way/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localsearchsource.com/?p=1223#comment-173</guid>
		<description>&quot;few of these SEO services I’m hearing within the local-space really address all the critical SEO factors (on-page factors, inbound links, social, listings, ratings/reviews, etc.). High organic rank and visibility is a product of multiple efforts and hard work – don’t’ get fooled by anything less.&quot;

I was beginning to think I was the only one who thought and worked like this. Thank you for reiterating what I&#039;ve been saying all along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;few of these SEO services I’m hearing within the local-space really address all the critical SEO factors (on-page factors, inbound links, social, listings, ratings/reviews, etc.). High organic rank and visibility is a product of multiple efforts and hard work – don’t’ get fooled by anything less.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was beginning to think I was the only one who thought and worked like this. Thank you for reiterating what I&#8217;ve been saying all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Place Pages: an update&#8230; by Caution! Unrealistic Internet Marketing Claims Coming Your Way! &#171; Local Search Source</title>
		<link>http://www.localsearchsource.com/2011/04/03/google-place-pages-an-update/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Caution! Unrealistic Internet Marketing Claims Coming Your Way! &#171; Local Search Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localsearchsource.com/?p=1206#comment-126</guid>
		<description>[...] for nothing? Online, local businesses really can get something for nothing! Inclusion within Google Place Pages, Yahoo! Local and Bing Maps is FREE, and it&#8217;s a good place to start building an online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for nothing? Online, local businesses really can get something for nothing! Inclusion within Google Place Pages, Yahoo! Local and Bing Maps is FREE, and it&#8217;s a good place to start building an online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

